VVD0D95
Banned
Without being king and having to deal with Edward I? He should be fine. He was a middling lordI hope poor Toom Tabard gets a better fate ttl. I've always pitied him a bit
Without being king and having to deal with Edward I? He should be fine. He was a middling lordI hope poor Toom Tabard gets a better fate ttl. I've always pitied him a bit
If he's with a woman, the relationship is heterosexual. He may be bi, or gay, but the relationship between a man and a woman is heterosexual no matter what.I Edward’s case the Het is questionable
I Edward’s case the Het is questionable
I think Edward's sexuality was complex, but I seem to remember that he sired 4 legitimate children with Isabella of France and also had a couple of bastards. That seems to imply that he preferred women and the only man he had sexual attraction toward may have been Piers Gaveston.If he's with a woman, the relationship is heterosexual. He may be bi, or gay, but the relationship between a man and a woman is heterosexual no matter what.
I think he was bi. Piers was his lover but Despenser was mostly eye candy to distract him. In my opinion, at least.I think Edward's sexuality was complex, but I seem to remember that he sired 4 legitimate children with Isabella of France and also had a couple of bastards. That seems to imply that he preferred women and the only man he had sexual attraction toward may have been Piers Gaveston.
[In] Edward’s case, [that] is questionable
If he's with a woman, the relationship is heterosexual. He may be bi, or gay, but the relationship between a man and a woman is heterosexual no matter what.
I think Edward's sexuality was complex, but I seem to remember that he sired 4 legitimate children with Isabel
Well in any event, Edward II was a very poor king, or at least such is his historical reputation; I don't know that giving him a different and earlier wife would change that, hence my suggestion to just kill him early. Also so we can get to an effective British Union sooner.I think he was bi. Piers was his lover but Despenser was mostly eye candy to distract him. In my opinion, at least.
Margaret isn't just a different wife, she's a wife who's also a sovereign rulerWell in any event, Edward II was a very poor king, or at least such is his historical reputation; I don't know that giving him a different and earlier wife would change that, hence my suggestion to just kill him early. Also so we can get to an effective British Union sooner.
Margaret isn't just a different wife, she's a wife who's also a sovereign ruler
There was also a bigger age difference between Edward and Isabella then between Edward and Margaret, so they might connect better.Well, since Margaret is blank slate, she could have personality which could make Edward truly fall in love with her? Love can certainly changed the man as far as I am concerned, Edward didn't love Isabella of France, his relationship with Gaveston IMHO indicates some trust issues on Edward's part and since he knows Margaret from childhood, he could have been able to trust her more than he did trust Isabella.
Also Isabella's taste in men wasn't quite amenable to her being paired up with Edward who was insecure and afraid about not being able to live up to expectations (at least, that is my interpretation of him), Isabella seemed to prefer active, decisive men like Roger Mortimer.
Marrying a slightly older, likely determined girl who was already Queen in her own right at 14, instead of being married at 23 years to a 12 years old girl is NOT simply having a different earlier wife … It is getting a totally different lifestyle since he was 14, specially as he was already 15/16 when Piers Gaveston became part of his household, so there is no reason for which here he could NOT cling to Margaret as he had done in OTL to Piers…Well in any event, Edward II was a very poor king, or at least such is his historical reputation; I don't know that giving him a different and earlier wife would change that, hence my suggestion to just kill him early. Also so we can get to an effective British Union sooner.
Well I suppose he could go for a "rough wooing" of his own, but afaik at this point in time he had relatively good relations with the Scots, so things probably don't get *too* heatedHow will Edward "the Hammer of the Scots" react to the Scots' refusal to hand over the Maid of Norway? OTL he crushed the Scots in every battle he every battle he ever fought against them, conquered the nation and forced them to their knees. It'll be interesting to see how this TL plays out.
One of the most interesting possibilities in the history of medieval British Isles in my opinion. What if the Maid of Norway lived? Absolutely can't wait to see how this goes.
And we all know the rough wooing resulted in the scots going 'Oh YEAH, DEFINITELY. TAKE THE KID.'Well I suppose he could go for a "rough wooing" of his own, but afaik at this point in time he had relatively good relations with the Scots, so things probably don't get *too* heated
I mean, it's fairly understandable that the Scots want to raise Margaret as Scottish. They don't want Scotland to become completely subsumed under EnglandLongshanks better head up to Scotland and put things in order 😡😡, the Anglo-Scottish union will not be delayed. I do hope for a good relationship between Prince Edward and Queen Margaret. Keep up the good work.
Though she couldn't last through the night. Anyone else remember sleeping in chairs pushed together at 7 during a wedding???Aw Margaret is adorable, I am glad that she made it through the ceremony alright...